Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 17.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Neurosci. 2021 Aug;135(4):550–570. doi: 10.1037/bne0000474

Table 6.

Initiation Omissions, Better Choice Latency, and Reward Collection Latency During Discrimination Learning

Coefficients Discrimination learning
Formula: γ ~ [1 + Group × Sex]
β SE tStat df P CIL CIU
γ = initiation omissions
 Intercept 236.00 145.72 1.6195 21 .1203 −67.05 539.05
 Group 76.125 185.76 0.4098 21 .6861 −310.19 462.44
 Sex −11.000 218.59 −0.0503 21 .9603 −465.58 443.58
 Group:sex 462.88 272.63 1.6978 21 .1043 −104.08 1029.8
γ = better choice latency
 Intercept 0.9173 0.1052 8.7342 21 <.0001 0.6989 1.1357
 Group 0.0555 0.1339 0.4147 21 .6826 −0.2229 0.3339
 Sex −0.0619 0.1575 −0.3931 21 .6982 −0.3895 0.2657
 Group:sex −0.1631 0.1965 −0.8303 21 .4157 −0.5717 0.2455
γ = reward collection latency
 ntercept 1.9705 0.1200 16.42 21 <.0001 1.7209 2.2201
 Group −0.6006 0.1530 −3.9258 21 .0008 −0.9187 −0.2824
 Sex −0.2429 0.1800 −1.3492 21 .1916 −0.6172 0.1315
 Group:sex 0.3960 0.2245 1.7638 21 .0923 −0.0709 0.8629

Note. Bold values indicates p < 0.05.