Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 17.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Neurosci. 2021 Aug;135(4):550–570. doi: 10.1037/bne0000474

Table 8.

Initiation Omissions, Better Choice Latency, and Reward Collection Latency During Reversal Learning With Discrimination Sessions to Criterion (dis_stc) as a Covariate

Coefficients Reversal learning (covariate: discrimination sessions to criterion)
Formula: γ ~ [1 + Group × Sex + dis_stc]
β SE tStat df P CIL CIU
γ = initiation omissions
 Intercept 445.62 116.21 3.8344 20 .0010 203.2 688.04
 Group 272.93 142.18 1.9197 20 .0693 −23.643 569.50
 Sex −125.48 167.93 −0.7472 20 .4636 −475.77 224.81
 dis_stc −7.9773 5.2301 −1.5253 20 .1428 −18.887 2.9325
 Group:sex −123.20 204.87 −0.6014 20 .5544 −550.55 304.15
γ = better choice latency
 Intercept 0.8958 0.0996 8.9951 20 <.0001 0.6881 1.1036
 Group −0.1719 0.1218 −1.4106 20 .1737 −0.4260 0.0823
 Sex −0.3170 0.1439 −2.2026 20 .0395 −0.6172 −0.0168
 dis_stc −0.0007 0.0045 −0.1653 20 .8570 −0.0101 0.0086
 Group:sex 0.2194 0.1756 1.2498 20 .2258 0.1468 0.5856
γ = reward collection latency
 Intercept 1.8448 0.1521 12.131 20 <.0001 1.5275 2.162
 Group −0.5274 0.1861 −2.8348 20 .0102 −0.9155 −0.1393
 Sex −0.4372 0.2198 −1.9894 20 .0605 −0.8956 0.0212
 dis_stc 0.0062 0.0068 0.9009 20 .3784 −0.0081 0.0204
 Group:sex 0.4548 0.2681 1.6965 20 .1053 −0.1044 1.014

Note. Bold values indicates p < 0.05.