Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 17.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr 13;13(4):e008587. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008587

Table 1.

QCA, coronary physiology and IVUS findings by Sex

Variable Total (n=277) Women (n=212) Men (n=65)

QCA findings
Minimal lumen diameter, mm
 Baseline 1.54±0.31 1.52±0.31 1.61±0.30
 After Ach 20µ dose 1.41±0.35 1.42±0.33 1.39±0.42
 After Ach 50µ dose 1.35±0.39 1.34±0.37 1.37±0.48
 After Ach 100µ dose 1.37±0.43 1.37±0.40 1.37±0.54
 After Ach 200µ dose 1.40±0.42 1.43±0.38 1.27±0.64
 After nitroglycerin 200µ dose 1.69±0.30 1.66±0.29 1.76±0.32
Endothelial dysfunction 186 (68.1) 140 (66.4) 46 (74.2)
Max %MLD constriction* 45±17 43±16 51±18
Chest pain during Ach testing 48 (17.5) 38 (18.0) 10 (15.6)
Ischemic ECG changes during Ach testing 27 (9.8) 23 (10.9) 4 (6.2)
Complications during Ach testing
 Atrioventricular block 19 (6.9) 14 (6.6) 5 (7.8)
 Bradycardia 9 (3.3) 6 (2.8) 3 (4.7)
 Atrial fibrillation 3 (1.1) 2 (0.9) 1 (1.6)
Physiology findings
 IMR 19.65±8.77 19.96±9.19 18.62±7.19
 Microvascular dysfunction 61 (22.0) 53 (25.0) 8 (12.3)
 CFR 4.32±3.53 4.17±3.91 4.81±1.79
 CFR<2.0 20 (7.2) 19 (9.0) 1 (1.5)
 CFR<2.5 43 (15.5) 38 (17.9) 5 (7.7)
 FFR 0.86±0.05 0.86±0.06 0.84±0.05
 FFR<0.80 30 (10.8) 23 (10.8) 7 (10.8)
 IVUS findings
 MPB, % 39.9 [29.5, 52.2] 38.9 [28.8, 50.8] 44.9 [32.6, 57.4]
 MLA, mm2 4.54±1.85 4.51±1.89 4.65±1.71
 Myocardial bridge 164 (59.2) 123 (58.0) 41 (63.1)
*

Data presented for patients with endothelial dysfunction;

defined as IMR≥25; CFR=coronary flow reserve; FFR=fractional flow reserve; IMR=index of microcirculatory resistance; QCA=Quantitative Coronary angiography;