Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 17;12:10233. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14252-4

Table 1.

Effect of crocin ± acrolein on anthropometric parameters in different studied groups.

Control group Cr group Ac group (n10) Oral-Cr/Ac group (n10) ip-Cr/Ac group (n10) p value
Oral-saline (n5) ip-saline (n5) Oral-Cr (n5) ip-Cr (n5)
Body weight (gm) 242.6 ± 21.8 232.6 ± 23.6 233.5 ± 14.7 229.2 ± 16.4 201.3 ± 11.3a 221.4 ± 24.5 232.5 ± 18.2c 0.0031
Wet lung weight (gm) 1.4 ± 0.2 1.5 ± 0.4 1.6 ± 0.4 1.4 ± 0.6 2.3 ± 0.7a 1.9 ± 0.6 1.8 ± 0.4 0.0183
Lung index* 6.4 ± 2.1 6.5 ± 1.3 7.2 ± 3.1 7.9 ± 3.5 10.2 ± 0.7a 8.1 ± 1.3c 6.9 ± 0.9c 0.0013
Dry lung weight (gm) 0.52 ± 0.14 0.49 ± 0.1 0.5 ± 0.04 0.53 ± 0.05 0.6 ± 0.2 0.56 ± 0.6 0.62 ± 0.7 0.9966
W/D % 3.3 ± 1.1 2.9 ± 1.5 3.2 ± 0.7 3 ± 0.4 6.4 ± 1.7b 4.7 ± 1.3c 3.9 ± 0.6d  < 0.001

One-way ANOVA, and Tukey HSD Post-hoc Test, p > 0.05: no significant differences, p < 0.05: significant differences.

*Lung index = wet lung weight (gr)/body weight (gr) × 1000; wet/ dry lung weight%.

ap < 0.05 versus oral-saline group.

bp < 0.001 significant versus oral-saline group.

cp < 0.05 versus Ac group.

dp < 0.001 significant versus Ac group.

ep < 0.05 versus oral-Cr/Ac group.

fp < 0.001 significant versus oral-Cr/Ac group.