Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 17;12:10233. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14252-4

Table 3.

Effect of crocin ± acrolein on histological and immunohistochemical morphometrical parameters of lung tissue in different studied groups.

Control group (n10) Cr group (n10) Ac group (n10) Oral-Cr/Ac group (n10) ip-Cr/Ac group (n10) p value
H&E morphometry
Lung injury score 2.2 ± 0.75 2.75 ± 0.5 13.3 ± 2.7b 8.7 ± 1.6bd 4.4 ± 1.5adf  < 0.001
Radial alveolar count 39.4 ± 7.2 41.2 ± 5.4 19.4 ± 4.2b 27.3 ± 5.4bc 30.2 ± 4.3ad  < 0.001
Alveolar no./field 207.6 ± 15.6 211.3 ± 21.4 142.3 ± 17.3b 169.3 ± 23.5bc 183.4 ± 19.6d  < 0.001
Mean linear intercept 52.3 ± 8.3 49.2 ± 9.1 78.2 ± 11.2b 64.2 ± 7.8c 59.3 ± 10.2d  < 0.001
Masson’s trichrome morphometry
Lung fibrotic score 0.5 ± 0.25 0.75 ± 0.25 3.5 ± 0.5b 2.5 ± 1bc 1 ± 0.25df  < 0.001
Immunohistochemical morphometry
Anti-BAX grade 0.7 ± 0.25 0.9 ± 0.3 3.5 ± 0.5b 2 ± 0.7ad 1 ± 0.5df  < 0.001
Anti-Bcl2 grade 3.4 ± 0.6 3.5 ± 0.25 1 ± 0.5b 1.5 ± 1b 2.85 ± 0.75df  < 0.001
Bcl2/BAX index 4.8 ± 1.52 4.1 ± 1.12 0.32 ± 0.09b 0.81 ± 0.21b 2.86 ± 1.74bdf  < 0.001

One-way ANOVA, and Tukey HSD Post-hoc Test, p > 0.05: no significant differences, p < 0.05: significant differences.

ap < 0.05 versus control group.

bp < 0.001 significant versus control group.

cp < 0.05 versus Ac group.

dp < 0.001 significant versus Ac group.

ep < 0.05 versus oral-Cr/Ac group.

fp < 0.001 significant versus oral-Cr/Ac group.