Table 2.
The effect of extraction method, company and sampling period on AFB1 and AFB2 in peanut oils
Parameter | AFB1 (mean ± SDa, μg kg−1) | AFB2 (mean ± SD, μg kg−1) | |
---|---|---|---|
Company | A1 | 65.0d ± 46.23 | 12.44c ± 7.71 |
A2 | 76.77c ± 56.12 | 10.53e ± 5.53 | |
A3 | 16.21 g ± 15.98 | 2.42 g ± 1.32 | |
A4 | 102.91a ± 71.35 | 26.67a ± 12.22 | |
A5 | 86.23b ± 65.58 | 14.22b ± 8.79 | |
A6 | 102.63a ± 54.73 | 24.58a ± 10.83 | |
A7 | 100.75a ± 50.60 | 24.28a ± 10.02 | |
A8 | 50.91e ± 15.29 | 11.70d ± 3.24 | |
A9 | 29.13f ± 16.27 | 6.41f ± 2.59 | |
Significance level | ** | ** | |
Applied method | Peanut | 137.93a ± 66.75 | 22.47a ± 12.61 |
Solvent extraction | 39.34d ± 22.59 | 7.38d ± 4.73 | |
Cold pressing of roasted peanuts | 48.11c ± 27.94 | 13.87c ± 9.38 | |
Cold Pressing | 54.90b ± 28.84 | 15.44b ± 8.55 | |
Significance level | ** | ** | |
Period | 1 | 73.54a ± 60.66 | 13.79ab ± 9.02 |
2 | 63.12b ± 49.55 | 14.58a ± 11.58 | |
3 | 72.11a ± 57.84 | 15.76a ± 11.10 | |
4 | 71.50a ± 56.55 | 15.01a ± 10.01 | |
significance level | ** | ** |
aArithmetic mean ± standard deviation
The difference between the values indicated by different letters in the same column is statistically significant (p < 0.05), **: p < 0.01