Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 6;13:821613. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.821613

TABLE 5.

Ruminal microbiota community difference between the two groups by using the Mann–Whitney U test.

Items Groups
SEM P-value
RA RAS
Phylum
Bacteroidota 38.38 ± 4.96 53.61 ± 1.41 2.963 0.001
Firmicutes 43.98 ± 2.77 30.70 ± 2.41 2.567 < 0.001
Euryarchaeota 3.16 ± 1.16 2.20 ± 0.92 0.387 0.240
Proteobacteria 2.68 ± 0.38 3.87 ± 0.59 0.263 0.011
Verrucomicrobiota 0.38 ± 0.13 0.43 ± 0.15 0.046 0.577
Chloroflexi 0.13 ± 0.04 0.32 ± 0.07 0.040 0.004
Synergistota 0.27 ± 0.05 0.90 ± 0.27 0.140 0.005
Desulfobacterota 0.68 ± 0.11 0.34 ± 0.08 0.069 0.002
Actinobacteriota 1.06 ± 0.28 0.28 ± 0.02 0.169 0.002
Spirochaetota 0.46 ± 0.19 1.00 ± 0.22 0.130 0.017
Genus
Prevotella 11.04 ± 0.10 8.10 ± 1.43 0.707 0.018
Methanobrevibacter 2.67 ± 0.74 1.20 ± 0.85 0.290 0.274
Quinella 0.56 ± 0.08 0.56 ± 0.35 0.080 0.993
Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group 6.73 ± 1.74 12.33 ± 0.79 1.240 0.004
Prevotellaceae_UCG-001 1.56 ± 0.31 1.39 ± 0.54 0.164 0.659
Succiniclasticum 3.66 ± 0.92 4.57 ± 0.50 0.337 0.203
NK4A214_group 2.72 ± 0.71 1.43 ± 0.25 0.311 0.018
Christensenellaceae_R-7_group 6.60 ± 1.11 4.07 ± 1.40 0.565 0.013
UCG-005 1.37 ± 0.46 1.08 ± 0.11 0.139 0.351
Ruminococcus 1.59 ± 0.41 3.93 ± 0.23 0.660 0.041