Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 6;13:868094. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.868094

Table 3.

Difference of prevalence in diagnosed Gestational diabetes mellitus of participants in 2016 and 2017.


2016 2017 Pdifference
Case No. % (95% CI) Case No. % (95% CI)
All 974 8.2 (7.5–8.9) a 799 8.4 (7.6–9.2) 0.99
BMI, kg/m2
<25 241 5.7 (4.8–6.7) 188 5.6 (4.5–6.7) 0.97
25–30 298 9.1 (7.7–10.5) 238 8.6 (7.3–9.9) 0.98
>30 385 10.3 (8.9–11.7) 337 11.7 (9.7–13.6) 0.96
Race/ethnicity
Hispanic 160 9.5 (7.4–11.6) 135 8.7 (6.6–10.9) 0.96
Non-Hispanic white 583 7.6 (6.7–8.5) 501 8.4 (7.4–9.4) 0.96
Non-Hispanic black 128 7.3 (5.8–8.8) 103 7.0 (5.4–8.6) 0.97
Other race/ethnicity 103 11.1 (8.5–13.8) 60 9.6 (6.8–12.4) 0.93
Poverty ratio category
<100 126 10.2 (8.5–11.9) 160 10.8 (8.7–12.9) 0.99
100–199 141 9.0 (7.1–10.8) 151 8.4 (6.7–10.2) 0.98
200–399 175 7.5 (6.2–8.8) 235 8.8 (7.4–10.2) 0.93
400+ 263 7.6 (6.1–9.1) 225 6.8 (5.0–8.5) 0.93
Physical activity
Insufficiently active 52 9.3 (6.2–12.4) 218 7.2 (6.0–8.4) 0.99
Sufficiently active 93 9.1 (6.9–11.4) 183 8.6 (7.0–10.2) 0.99
Highly active 266 7.5 (6.3–8.7) 378 8.6 (7.3–9.8) 0.94
a

GDM prevalence was calculated with age-standardized to the U.S. population in the year 2000.