Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 18;4(6):532–539. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.02.007

Table 3.

Exploratory clinical outcomes for thiamine vs placebo

Outcome n Thiamine (n = 24) Placebo (n = 24) Mean difference (95% CI) P
Peak GLS, % 10 –8.4 (3.4) –8.0 (3.7) 0.42 (–0.8, 1.6) 0.451
LVEF, % 13 39.4 (11.5) 36.7 (12.7) –2.8 (–7.0, 1.3) 0.173
KCCQ overall score 18 60.1 (19.5) 67.0 (19.6) –6.8 (13.3, –4.0) 0.046
KCCQ clinical score 18 69.3 (16.4) 72.3 (16.9) –2.9 (–3.3, 9.3) 0.338
NYHA class, mean (SD) 19 1.79 (0.5) 1.68 (0.6) 0.1 (–1.7, 0.4) 0.414
NYHA class, median (IQR) 19 2 (1.25–2) 2 (1–2) N/A 0.414
NT-proBNP, mean (SD) 14 2805.2 (3099.8) 3781.1 (4533.9) –975.8 (–2124.5, 172.7) 0.113
NT-proBNP, median (IQR) 14 2033.5 (1265.3–3475.0) 4144.0 (1225.5–4858) N/A 0.140

Values are mean (standard deviation), unless otherwise indicated. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class also compared with Wilxocon test because of skew (P = 0.140 and P = 0.414, respectively)

GLS, global longitudinal strain; KCCQ, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (quality of life); LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; N/A, not applicable.

Paired difference.

P values for treatment effect from analysis of variance that includes period and carryover effect.