Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 20;84(8):75. doi: 10.1007/s11538-022-01031-5

Table 4.

List of parameters estimated by the ABC model calibration technique, including their corresponding prior distributions

Parameter Meaning Prior distribution
β1, β2, β3 Transmission parameters uniform on [0.01, 0.66]
β4, β5 Transmission parameters uniform on [0.01, 0.99]
dE Duration of exposed period normal: mean 5.08, s.d. 0.5*
dP Duration of presymptomatic period uniform on [2, 7]**
dS Duration of symptomatic period uniform on [6, 10]
pS1 Proportion symptomatic for children uniform on [0.01, 0.99]
pS2, pS3 Proportion symptomatic for adults and seniors uniform on [0.5, 0.99]
pT1, pT2, pT3 Proportion going to tests among children, adults, seniors uniform on [0.5, 0.99]
rβ Proportional reduction in transmissibility in a/presymptomatic individuals uniform on [0.4, 1]
rC Proportional contact reduction in symptomatic individuals uniform on [0.01, 0.4]
pP Proportional reduction in transmission due to personal protection uniform on [0.01, 0.5]

*Based on He et al. (2020)

**Wei et al. (2020) report 1–3 days

He et al. (2020) re-analyzed results previously published in local Chinese journals to show a higher probability of virus transmission in symptomatic individuals [the asymptomatic infection rate to be 46% of the symptomatic one, with the 95% CI (18.48–73.60%)], but the source of primary data could not be verified. The value of 0.55 was assumed by Domenico et al. (2020) in setting up their model, based on Li et al. (2020) but for “undocumented” rather than “asymptomatic” patients. On the other hand (Chen et al. 2020), showed no statistically significant difference in the transmissibility of the virus between symptomatic and a/presymptomatic cases

Estimates vary significantly as does the quality of the evidence. The range of the percentage of the asymptomatic individuals among those positively tested reported is 4.4–89%