Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 24;2015(8):CD004464. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004464.pub3

3.6. Analysis.

Comparison 3 Faecal incontinence: crossover trials, Outcome 6 Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score.

Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score
Study Group Measure Patients Baseline Three months 'Off' period 'On' period Change (%) Follow‐up Notes
Kahlke 2015#   Mean (SD) 14 16 (4.6)   14.6 (4.6) 8.7 (3.6) ‐5.9 (‐40%) 6.4 (3.3) p<0.05
Kahlke 2015#                    
Kahlke 2015#                    
Leroi 2005# Whole group Median (range) Baseline: 23
 3 months: 16
 'Off' period: 15
 'On' period: 17 16 (8 to 20) 9 (0 to 19) 10.5 (4 to 17) 8.5 (3 to 18) ‐2 (‐19%) Not reported for whole group 1. Cleveland Clinic scores are reported for whole group.
 2. The score ranges from 0 (normal continence) to 20 (maximum incontinence)
Leroi 2005# Group of 19 who chose 'on' following the crossover period Median (range) Baseline: 18
 3 months: 13
 'Off' period: 12
 'On' period: 14
 Follow‐up: 18 16 (8 to 20) 8 (0 to 15) 10 (4 to 17) 8 (3 to 15) ‐2 (‐20%) 10 (3 to 17) 1. P < 0.05: 3 months, 'off' period, 'on' period, follow‐up versus baseline.
Leroi 2005# Group of 5 who chose 'off' following the crossover period Median (range) Baseline: 5
 3 months: 3
 'Off' period: 3
 'On' period: 3
 Follow‐up: 3 16 (12 to 20) 14 (9 to 19) 15 (11 to 15) 15 (14 to 18) 0 13 (11 to 18)  
Thin 2015 PTNS group Mean±SD 16 15.1 ± 2.7 11.7 ± 4.4     ‐3 (‐ 20%) 12.1 ± 5.2 Follow‐up was at 6 months. % change is reported as the difference between baseline and at 6 months.
Thin 2015 SNS group Mean±SD 15 16.3 ± 3.3 10.0 ± 5.3     ‐7.2(‐44%) 9.1 ± 5.4 Follow‐up was at 6 months. % change is reported as the difference between baseline and at 6 months.
Thin 2015                    
Tjandra 2008 Control group Mean±SD 60 15.2±1.6 12.1±2.1 14.1+1.9   ‐1.1 (‐7%) 14.1±1.9 p > 0.05 at 3 months and 12 months compared with baseline. Follow‐up was at 12 months. % change is reported as the difference between baseline and at 12 months.
Tjandra 2008 SNS group Mean±SD 53 16±1.3 1.1±1 1.2+1.8   ‐14.8 (‐93%) 1.2±1.8 P < 0.0001 at all time points compared with baseline. Follow‐up was at 12 months. % change is reported as the difference between baseline and at 12 months.
Tjandra 2008