Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 20;12:10311. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13947-y

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Improvement in distance logMAR visual acuity. (a) Distribution of change from baseline (CFB) in logMAR dVA in children and adults. (b) Time course of dVA recovery in children. The negative exponential fit indicates improvement (solid line) during the therapy (thick black line) and the expected improvement rate (dotted line) had the therapy been continued. Children’s improvement remained stable at 1-m follow-up without regression. (c) Division of children’s change over time based on the exponent of the fitted exponential: green, red, and gray indicates improvement, decline, and no change, respectively. (d, e) Results of the prediction analysis: (d) Children’s interocular dVA recovery was strikingly dependent on the presence of astigmatism: non-astigmatic children’s potential for improvement increased with worse baseline interocular dVA, while the opposite was true for astigmatic children. (e) Adults’ modest progress, on the other hand, did not depend on their baseline dVA, nor did the presence of astigmatism had any impact on it. Red circles signify astigmatic patients, light gray solid line indicates a linear fit for non-astigmatic children, while the dashed line is the linear fit for astigmatic children. NCh = 24, NAd = 18, except for (d, e), where NCh = 21, NAd = 17. Means ± SEM.