Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 20;12:10372. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14632-w

Table 1.

Overview of demographic, lifestyle, environmental, and biological exposures included in the current study.

Exposure Label Rounda
Demographic exposures
Sex Male; female r1
Age In years r1–r5
Educational level (highest level of education attained) Primary education or less; lower vocational education or lower secondary education; intermediate vocational education or higher secondary education; higher vocational education or university r1–r4
Nationality Dutch; non-Dutch r1
Marital status Single, never married; married; widow/widower; divorced r1–r5
Household composition With partner; with partner and children; single-parent household; single household; other household r2–r5
Working hours In hours per week r2–r5
Lifestyle exposures
Alcohol use No, never; no, I stopped using alcohol; every now and then, but less than 1 glass per week; yes r1–r5
Number of glasses of alcohol per day In glasses per day r1–r5
Smoking status Smoker; former smoker; never smoker r1–r5
Number of cigarettes per day In cigarettes per day r1–r5
Smoking pack years In the number of smoking years times the number of packs smoked per day r1–r5
Occupational physical activity (EPIC Physical Activity Questionnaire (Pols et al. 1997)) Sedentary job; standing job; manual work; heavy manual work; not applicable r1–r5
Time spent on moderate to vigorous physical activity per week (EPIC Physical Activity Questionnaire (Pols et al. 1997))  < 0.5 h; 0.5–3.5 h; ≥ 3.5 h or more, of which < 2 h vigorous; ≥ 3.5 h, of which ≥ 2 h or more vigorous r2–r5
Dutch Healthy Diet index 2015 (Looman et al. 2017) On a scale from 0 to 130 (a higher score indicates higher adherence to the Dutch dietary guidelines) r2–r4
Number of hours of sleep per day  ≤ 5 h; 6 h; 7 h; 8 h; ≥ 9 h r1–r5
Reproductive cycle status Male; female, regular cycle; female, irregular cycle; female, pregnant; female, anticontraceptive or hormone use; female, unknown/surgery; female, menopause r1–r5
Environmental exposures
Total NO2 concentration at home address (dispersion models (Velders et al. 2020))b In ug/m3 r1–r5
Total PM2.5 concentration at home address (dispersion models (Velders et al. 2020))b In ug/m3 r1–r5
Total elemental carbon concentration at home address (dispersion models (Velders et al. 2020))b In ug/m3 r1–r5
Rail traffic noise levels in 2016 for the entire 24-h period at home address (Standard Model Instrumentation for Noise Assessments (Schreurs et al. 2010)) In dB r1–r5
Road traffic noise levels in 2016 for the entire 24-h period at home address (Standard Model Instrumentation for Noise Assessments (Schreurs et al. 2010)) In dB r1–r5
Normalized difference vegetation index in 2010 in buffer 300 m around home address (Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (United States Geological Service) On a scale from − 1 to 1 (higher score indicating more greenness) r1–r5
Normalized difference vegetation index in 2010 in buffer 1000 m around home address (Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (United States Geological Service)) On a scale from − 1 to 1 (higher score indicating more greenness) r1–r5
Damp stains in the house in the past two years Not at all; occasionally; often; always r2–r3
Mold growth in the house in the past two years Not at all; occasionally; often; always r2–r3
Hot water supply in the house Geyser with drain; geyser without drain; boiler; combi boiler; combination or other r2–r3
Heat source for cooking Gas; electric; combination or other r2–r3
Pet (cat, dog, bird or rodent) in the house Yes; no, not anymore; no, never r2–r3
Smoking in the participant's environment Yes, at home and at work; yes, at home; yes, at work; no r2–r3
Social support measured by positive social experiences (Van Oostrom et al. 1995) On a scale from 8 to 32 (higher score indicates more positive experiences) r1–r3
Social support measured by negative social experiences (Van Oostrom et al. 1995) On a scale from 8 to 32 (higher score indicates more negative experiences) r1–r3
Social support measure for elderly (Van Eijk et al. 1994) On a scale from 12 to 48 (higher score indicates more social support) r5
Loneliness scale (De Jong-Gierveld et al. 1985) On a scale from 0 to 11 (higher score indicates more loneliness) r5
Biological exposures
Body mass index In kg/m2 r1–r5
Waist/hip ratio Ratio r2–r5
Waist circumference In centimeters r2–r5
Pulse rate In beats per minute r1–r5
Systolic pressure In mm Hg r1–r5
Diastolic pressure In mm Hg r1–r5
Total cholesterol In mmol/l r1–r5
HDL cholesterol In mmol/l r1–r5
Total/HDL cholesterol ratio Ratio r1–r5
Use of high blood pressure medication Yes; no r1–r5
Use of cholesterol lowering medication Yes; no r1–r5

aMeasurement rounds during which an exposure was measured (round 1 20–59 years, round 2 26–65 years, round 3 31–70 years, round 4 36–75 years, round 5 41–80 years).

bBased on concentration estimates of the year 2000 for round 1–3; the average of the years 2000 and 2010 for round 4; and the year 2010 for round 5.