Table 1.

Outcomes including sensitivity identifying patients appropriate for asynchronous contact through the medical record and the reduction in the number of patients reviewed.

Week of review	February 7, 2020	February 14, 2020	February 21, 2020	February 28, 2020	March 6, 2020	March 13, 2020	March 20, 2020
Patients in study, N	56	58	59	62	64	64	64
Patients flagged by TIDEa, n	29	29	36	39	39	37	36
Patients reviewed, %	52	50	61	63	61	58	56
Reduction in patients reviewedb, %	48	50	39	37	39	62	63
True positive flagsc, %	29	21	31	27	30	34	34
True negative flagsd, %	23	17	19	15	9	16	19
False positive flagse, %	23	33	36	40	39	33	31
False negative flagsf, %	2	0	0	0	0	0	2
Insufficient CGMg data, %	9	10	10	6	8	9	9
Sensitivityb, %	94	100	100	100	100	100	96
Specificity, %	50	34	34	26	19	32	38
Positive predictive value, %	55	39	46	40	43	51	52
Negative predictive value, %	93	100	100	100	100	100	92

^aTIDE: timely interventions for diabetes excellence.

^bPrimary objective (italicized).

^cFlagged by TIDE and appropriate for asynchronous contact.

^dNot flagged by TIDE and not appropriate for asynchronous contact.

^eFlagged by TIDE and not appropriate for asynchronous contact.

^fNot flagged by TIDE and appropriate for asynchronous contact.

^gCGM: continuous glucose monitor.