Table 2.
Bias due to confounding | Bias in selection of participants | Bias in classifications of interventions | Bias due to deviations from intended interventions | Bias due to missing outcome data | Bias in measurement of the outcome | Bias in selection of the reported results | Overall risk of bias | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alluri et al 2020 28 | ||||||||
Buell et al 2018 29 | ||||||||
Buell et al 2019 30 | ||||||||
Ghobrial et al 2017 35 | ||||||||
Han et al 2019 36 | ||||||||
Hart et al 2008 37 | ||||||||
Hassanzadeh et al 2013 41 | ||||||||
Iyer et al 31 | ||||||||
Lee et al 2019 43 | ||||||||
Line et al 2020 32 | ||||||||
Matsumura et al 2018 42 | ||||||||
Martin et al 2013 38 | ||||||||
Raman et al 2017 39 | ||||||||
Rodriguez-Fontan et al 2019 34 | ||||||||
Safaee et al 2018 33 | ||||||||
Sandquist et al 2015 44 | ? | |||||||
Theologis and Burch 2015 40 | ||||||||
Viswanathan et al 2018 45 | ||||||||
Overall risk of bias criteria: Low: low in all domains Moderate: low or moderate in all domains Severe: severe in ≥ 1 domain Critical: critical in ≥ 1 domain |