Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 30;12(6):1282–1296. doi: 10.1177/21925682211034500

Table 3.

Primary and Secondary Outcomes.

Title Definition of PJK used in study Definition of PJF used in study Group PJK RR PJF incidence Clinical outcome Complications
Tether (tether only (TO) + tether and crosslink (TC))
Alluri et al 2020 28 Postoperative PJA ≥ 20° PJK necessitating revision surgery PS 32% 18% NR ODI*, All 62%
TC 33% 0% NR ODI*, All 49%
Buell et al 2018 29 Postoperative PJA ≥ 10° and ≥ 10° change than pre-op Mechanical failure at UIV or just above and/or proximal junctional posterior discoligamentous failure PS 45%* 5% 5% NR NR
TO 34% 9% 9% NR “None related to tether”
TC 18%* 4% 4% NR “None related to tether”
Buell et al 2019 30 Postoperative PJA ≥ 10° and ≥ 10° change than pre-op None, although revision surgery for PJK is mentioned PS 55% 6% NR NR NR
TO + TC 32% 5% NR NR “None related to tether”
Iyer et al 2020 31 Postoperative PJA ≥ 10° and ≥ 10° change than pre-op PJF not reported PS 29% 5% NR NR NR
TO 27% 0% NR NR NR
Line et al 2020 32 PJK not reported PJA ≥ 28.0° and change PJA ≥ 21.6° OR
Upper thoracic PJF: proximal junctional anterolisthesis ≥8 mm and change in proximal junctional anterolisthesis ≥8 mm
Lower thoracic PJF: proximal junctional anterolisthesis ≥3 mm and change in proximal junctional anterolisthesis ≥3mm
PS NR NR 20% NR NR
TO NR NR 16% NR NR
Safaee et al 2018 33 PJA change ≥ 10° postoperative compared to preoperative value PJK requiring surgical revision PS NR 18%* NR NR NR
TO 16% 4%* NR NR NR
Rodriguez-Fontan et al 34 PJA change ≥ 10° than pre-op Symptomatic PJK with or without instrumentation failure and or vertebral fracture at UIV+2 PS #38% NR #38% NR NR
TO #15% NR #15% NR NR
2 level prophylactic vertebroplasty (2-PVP)
Ghobrial et al 2017 35 Postoperative PJA ≥ 10° Revision surgery as a consequence of PJK (Proximal extension of fusion), or refractory pain PS 36%* 13%* 16% NR Major: 16†, Minor: 6†
2-PVP 24%* 0%* 0% NR Major: 16†, Minor: 6†
Han et al 2019 36 Postoperative PJA ≥ 10° and ≥ 10° change than pre-op Bony failure, ligamentous failure, instrument failure (implant breakage and pullout of UIV fixation). PS 46% 14% 32% NR Major 7, Minor 2
2-PVP 46% 4% 39% NR Major 1, Minor 2
Hart et al 2008 37 PJK not reported Proximal junctional acute collapse requiring extension of instrumented fusion PS NR NR 15% NR NR
2-PVP / 3-PVP NR NR 0 NR “None related to 2-PVP”
Line et al 2020 32 (see Line et al 2020 above) (see Line et al 2020 above) PS NR NR 20% NR NR
2-PVP NR NR 12% NR NR
Martin et al 2013 38 PJA change ≥ 10° postoperative compared to preoperative value acute proximal junctional fracture/fixation failure or substantial PJK that required revision or extension of the fusion proximally 2-PVP 8% 5% 5% ‡ODI, ‡SF-36, ‡SRS-24 Major 6, Minor 13
Raman et al 2017 39 PJA change ≥ 10° postoperative compared to preoperative value Proximal junctional fracture, fixation failure or kyphosis requiring extension of fusion within 6 months of surgery 2-PVP 28% 5% 5% NR Major 21, Minor 19
Theologis and Burch 2015 40 PJK not reported Proximal junctional fracture PS NR NR 21% ODI*, ‡VAS leg pain NR
PVP NR NR 22% ‡ODI*, ‡VAS back pain, ‡VAS leg pain NR
2-PVP NR NR 5% ‡ODI*, ‡EQ-5D, ‡EQ-Vas, ‡VAS back pain, ‡VAS leg pain NR
Transverse process hooks (TPH)
Hassanzadeh et al 2013 41 Postoperative PJA ≥ 10° and ≥ 10° change than pre-op PJF not reported PS 30%* 7%* NR ODI*, ‡SRS-22* Major 7, Minor 15
TPH 0%* 0%* NR ODI*, ‡SRS-22* Major 3, Minor 13
Line et al 2020 32 (see Line et al 2020 above) (see Line et al 2020 above) PS NR NR 20% NR NR
TPH NR NR 7% NR NR
Matsumura et al 2018 42 PJK not reported Fracture at UIV (Fx) or PJA > 20° (PJA) PS NR NR 27% (27%PJFx,
0% PJA > 20°)
NR NR
TPH NR NR 18% (12% PJFx, 6% PJA > 20°) NR NR
Flexible rods (FR)
Lee et al 2019 43 Postoperative PJA ≥ 10° and ≥ 10° change than pre-op Classified as progressive PJK or PJFx PS 53%* NR 15% NR NR
38% NR NR
FR 10%* NR 0 NR NR
0% NR NR
Multilevel stabilization screws (MLSS)
Sandquist et al 2015 44 PJK not reported None, although revision surgery for fractures or instrumentation failure at the proximal junction is reported MLSS 0% NR 0% NR NR
Sublaminar Tapes (ST)
Viswanathan et al 2018 45 PJK not reported Unclear SLB 8% NR 0% ‡ODI, ‡VAS pain,, ‡VAS back pain, ‡SF-36 Major 9, Minor 27

Data is presented as relative value (%).

*Indicates that the mentioned study has reported these values as significantly different between groups.

Indicates that the mentioned study reported a significant improvement from pre-operative to final follow-up.

#Indicates that the mentioned study reported PJK and PJF combined, and did not report separate values.

2-PVP: 2-level prophylactic vertebroplasty, FR: flexible rod, MLSS: multilevel stabilization screws, PJA: proximal junctional angle, PJFx: proximal junctional fracture, PS: pedicle screw at the UIV (control group), RR: revision rate for PJK, ST: sublaminar tapes, TC: tether attached to crosslink at the UIV, TO: tether only at the UIV, TPH: transverse process hooks, UIV: upper instrumented vertebrae.