Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 24;2015(8):CD000144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000144.pub3

Ainsworth 2000.

Methods Randomized multicenter trial
 Blinding of randomization: yes
 (central telephone randomization using sealed envelopes)
 Blinding of intervention: no
 Complete follow‐up: no (excluded 13 randomized ineligible infants)
 Blinding of outcome measurement: no
 Stratification by referral center
Participants Gestational age 25‐30 weeks
 Intubated for presumed surfactant deficiency
 Clinical signs of RDS
 No evidence of life‐threatening congenital malformation
 Pumactant n= 100
 Curosurf (poractant alfa) n= 99
Interventions Curosurf (poractant alfa) vs. pumactant
 Multiple doses
Outcomes PRIMARY: 
 Days spent in "high dependency care" (including assisted ventilation, NCPAP, supplemental oxygen greater than 40%, thoracostomy tube, weight less than 1000 grams)
 SECONDARY: 
 Neonatal mortality
 Complications of prematurity
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Central telephone randomization using sealed envelopes
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Blinding of randomization: yes
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Blinding of intervention: no
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk  
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Blinding of outcome measurement: no
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Complete follow‐up: no (excluded 13 randomized ineligible infants)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk