Table 2.

Moderated Mediation Model: Examining Paths A and B

	Sexual Activity Status n = 196		Program Acceptability n = 195
Mediator Model: Path A	b (SE)	t	b (SE)	t
Constant	−0.11 (0.06)	−1.91	3.16 (0.05)	69.90***
Intervention	0.20 (0.08)	2.48*	0.19 (0.06)	3.02**
Moderatora	0.02 (0.09)	0.18	−0.06 (0.06)	−0.95
Intervention x Moderatora	−0.00 (0.13)	−0.00	0.24 (0.09)	2.50*
Outcome Model: Path B
Constant	1.06 (0.05)	22.17***
Intervention	0.09 (0.06)	1.55
Sexual Self-Efficacy	0.03 (0.08)	0.33
Moderator – Sexual Activity Status	0.04 (0.06)	0.62
Sexual Self-Efficacy x Sexual Activity Status	0.28 (0.13)	2.16*

	Conditional Effects of Sexual Self-Efficacy at Values of Sexual Activity Status				Conditional Effects of HEART at Values of Program Acceptability
	b (SE)	LLCI	ULCI		b (SE)	LLCI	ULCI
Not sexually active	0.03 (0.08)	−0.14	0.19	−1 SD (−0.66)	0.03 (0.09)	−0.14	0.21
Sexually active	0.31 (0.10)	0.11	0.50	Mean (0.00)	0.19 (0.06)	0.06	0.31
				+1 SD (0.59)	0.33 (0.08)	0.16	0.49

Note. Unstandardized coefficients are reported. Bootstrap sample size = 5000. The mediator model (path A, Figure 1) is presented first, followed by the outcome model (path B, Figure 1) second. The two moderators are listed across the top of the table. The bottom half of the table contains the conditional effects of the moderators for significant interactions. LL = low limit. UL = upper limit. CI = confidence interval.

^aCorresponds to either sexual activity status or program acceptability depending on column.

^*p < .05,

^**p < .01;

^***p < .001