Table 3.
Risk factor of STH infection in traditional pig farmers in Bali.
| Risk factor | Positive | Negative | OR (95% CI) | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||
| Frek | % | Frek | % | |||
| Personal hygiene | 5.756 (2.96-11.193) | 0.000** | ||||
| Good | 17 | 7.14 | 137 | 57.56 | ||
| Poor | 35 | 14.7 | 49 | 20.59 | ||
| Sanitation | 1.914 (1.024-3.576) | 0.042* | ||||
| Good | 21 | 8.8 | 105 | 44.1 | ||
| Poor | 31 | 13 | 81 | 34 | ||
| Medical control | 1.186 (0.531-2.65) | 0.677 | ||||
| Good | 9 | 3.78 | 37 | 15.55 | ||
| Poor | 43 | 18.07 | 149 | 62.6 | ||
| Education level | 7.579 (2.621-21.915) | 0.000** | ||||
| High | 4 | 1.68 | 72 | 30.25 | ||
| Low | 48 | 20.17 | 114 | 47.9 | ||
| Income rate | 2.447 (1.122-5.338) | 0.025* | ||||
| High | 9 | 3.78 | 63 | 26.47 | ||
| Low | 43 | 18.07 | 123 | 51.68 | ||
| Main job as a pig farmer | 2.95 (1.356-6.415) | 0.006** | ||||
| No | 9 | 3.78 | 71 | 29.83 | ||
| Yes | 43 | 18.07 | 115 | 48.32 | ||
| Presence of STH infected pigs | 1.913 (0.841-4.351) | 0.122 | ||||
| No | 8 | 3.36 | 48 | 20.17 | ||
| Yes | 44 | 18.49 | 138 | 57.98 | ||
| Presence of pigsty in yard | 1.303 (0.684-2.483) | 0.421 | ||||
| No | 33 | 13.87 | 129 | 45.2 | ||
| Yes | 19 | 7.98 | 57 | 23.95 | ||
Highly significant,
Significant, OR=Odds ratio, CI=Confident interval