Skip to main content
. 2022 May 10;15(5):1154–1162. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2022.1154-1162

Table 5.

Risk factor of hookworm infection in traditional pig farmers in Bali.

Risk factor Positive Negative OR (95% CI) p-value


Frek % Frek %
Personal hygiene 3.548 (1.704-7.391) 0.001**
 Good 14 5.88 140 58.82
 Poor 22 9.24 62 26.05
Sanitation 1.310 (0.644-2.666) 0.456
 Good 17 7.14 109 45.8
 Poor 19 7.98 93 39.08
Medical control 0.673 (0.292-1.55) 0.352
 Good 9 3.78 37 15.55
 Poor 27 11.34 165 69.33
Education level 6.225 (1.845-21.006) 0.003**
 High 3 1.26 73 30.67
 Low 33 13.87 129 54.2
Income rate 1.623 (0.701-3.59) 0.258
 High 8 3.36 64 26.89
 Low 28 11.76 138 57.98
Main job as a pig farmer 2.891 (1.15-7.268) 0.024*
 No 6 2.52 74 31.09
 Yes 30 12.61 128 53.78
Presence of hookworm infected pigs 2.102 (0.876-5.046) 0.096
 No 7 2.94 68 28.57
 Yes 29 12.18 134 56.3
Presence of pigsty in yard 1.247 (0.594-2.62) 0.56
 No 23 9.66 139 58.4
 Yes 13 5.46 63 26.47
**

Highly significant,

*

Significant, OR=Odds ratio, CI=Confident interval