Table 5.
Risk factor of hookworm infection in traditional pig farmers in Bali.
| Risk factor | Positive | Negative | OR (95% CI) | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||
| Frek | % | Frek | % | |||
| Personal hygiene | 3.548 (1.704-7.391) | 0.001** | ||||
| Good | 14 | 5.88 | 140 | 58.82 | ||
| Poor | 22 | 9.24 | 62 | 26.05 | ||
| Sanitation | 1.310 (0.644-2.666) | 0.456 | ||||
| Good | 17 | 7.14 | 109 | 45.8 | ||
| Poor | 19 | 7.98 | 93 | 39.08 | ||
| Medical control | 0.673 (0.292-1.55) | 0.352 | ||||
| Good | 9 | 3.78 | 37 | 15.55 | ||
| Poor | 27 | 11.34 | 165 | 69.33 | ||
| Education level | 6.225 (1.845-21.006) | 0.003** | ||||
| High | 3 | 1.26 | 73 | 30.67 | ||
| Low | 33 | 13.87 | 129 | 54.2 | ||
| Income rate | 1.623 (0.701-3.59) | 0.258 | ||||
| High | 8 | 3.36 | 64 | 26.89 | ||
| Low | 28 | 11.76 | 138 | 57.98 | ||
| Main job as a pig farmer | 2.891 (1.15-7.268) | 0.024* | ||||
| No | 6 | 2.52 | 74 | 31.09 | ||
| Yes | 30 | 12.61 | 128 | 53.78 | ||
| Presence of hookworm infected pigs | 2.102 (0.876-5.046) | 0.096 | ||||
| No | 7 | 2.94 | 68 | 28.57 | ||
| Yes | 29 | 12.18 | 134 | 56.3 | ||
| Presence of pigsty in yard | 1.247 (0.594-2.62) | 0.56 | ||||
| No | 23 | 9.66 | 139 | 58.4 | ||
| Yes | 13 | 5.46 | 63 | 26.47 | ||
Highly significant,
Significant, OR=Odds ratio, CI=Confident interval