Table 2.

Relative likelihood of the different models.

Model	Max(log10(Lhoodi)a	${{\displaystyle \text{AIC}}}_{\text{i}}^{\text{b}}$	Δib	Model normalized
				relative likelihood
				(wi)b
Model 1	−752381556.3	356121231.2	3569618.436	~0
Model 2	−766668258.6	355678656.1	3658352.526	~0
Model 3	−769356470.5	354588633.5	2636451.235	~0
Model 4	−707411635.8	356531580.6	0	~1
Model 5	−738200638.82	355259547.5	2065856.026	~0
Model 6	−742253556.3	355955172.2	216486.022	~0
Model 7	−742377887.6	358863315.6	1868753.036	~0
Model 8	−741803292.7	354568532.2	658541.035	~0
Model 9	−72078163.5	353426226.1	1522688.015	~0
Model 10	−737524429.5	353223549.6	1478223.020	~0
Model 11	−737955129.5	352793852.6	4583631.025	~0
Model 12	−740129825.3	353659253.0	2587456.015	~0
Model 13	−743961354.6	353336542.2	5214852.061	~0
Model 14	−743705455.5	356823658.2	136586.099	~0
Model 15	−741996176.5	353338885.3	1253589.018	~0
Model 16	−740495214.920	356852515.6	2659565.498	~0
Model 17	−745052395.561	359596326.3	2568742.259	~0
Model 18	−739893331.173	355944120.3	375961.568	~0

^aBased on the best likelihood among the 50 independent runs for each model.

^bThe calculation of AIC_i, Δ_i, and w_i are according to the methods shown in Excoffier et al. (2013).