TABLE 1. Characteristics of population and confirmatory studies used in the included studies.
|
First author and year, country, and design |
Population |
STIs included and confirmatory test methods |
|---|---|---|
|
Clarke 2012 (21), Costa Rica, Cohort |
Random sample of 20% of Guanacaste census. Women of 18 years or older were included. Researchers made a random sample stratified by age to assess C. trachomatis prevalence. |
|
|
de Lima 2014 (22), Brazil, Cross sectional |
Sexually active, non-pregnant women aged 15 to 24 years monitored by a domestic family health program in three cities. |
|
|
Figueiredo 2013 (23), Brazil, Cross sectional |
Female adolescents aged 15 to 19 years, who were not pregnant or postpartum, had not used oral or vaginal antimicrobial drugs in the previous 15 days, and had not engaged in sexual intercourse in the previous 48 hours. |
|
|
Figueiró-Filho 2007 (24), Brazil, Cross sectional |
All pregnant women aged 11 to 49 years who received prenatal care triage through serology. |
|
|
Franceschi 2007 (25), Colombia–Argentina, Cross sectional |
Random sample, age-stratified of sexually active, non-pregnant women aged 15 to 65 years. Their recruitment sources varied between countries and included census, mandatory family planning clinic list, among others. Each city recruited a sample of 100 women in each age group. |
|
|
Gabster 2016 (34), Panama, Cross sectional |
592 participants, aged 14 to 18 years, enrolled in public high schools in the District of Panama, who agreed to participate. |
|
|
Hernández-Girón 2005 (26), Mexico, Cross sectional |
The study comprised two populations; population 2 (non-pregnant women) was included in the present review, as population 1 (pregnant women) was not randomly selected. A random sample of 1 060 non-pregnant women aged 15 to 85 years who received cervical cancer screening at the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS) in Cuernavaca, Mexico. |
|
|
Matos 2003 (27), Argentina, Cross sectional |
Non-pregnant women aged ≥15 years, without previous hysterectomy or conization. The population was recruited from a national census subsample. |
|
|
Miranda 2004 (28), Brazil, Cross sectional |
Young women aged 15 to 19 years residing in Vitória, Brazil. |
|
|
Paredes 2015 (29), Colombia, Cross sectional |
Sexually active adolescents aged 14 to 19 years enrolled in secondary and high schools located in Sabana Centro province, Colombia. |
|
|
Pinto 2011 (30), Brazil, Cross sectional |
Parturient women attending Brazilian public hospitals. The maternity units were selected through random sample stratified by region. |
|
|
Santos 2016 (31), Brazil, Not specified |
A random sample of 515 sexually active women attending public or private cytology and colposcopy services. |
|
|
Silveira 2017 (32), Brazil, Cross sectional |
Pregnant women aged 15 to 29 years admitted during labor in all maternity wards in Pelotas, Brazil. The study excluded women who had reported the use of antibiotics in the previous month to the recruitment. |
|
|
Tamayo 2011 (33), Colombia, Cross sectional |
Sexually active students inscribed in secondary and high schools (9th and 11th Grade). |
|
|
Vallés 2009 (35), Guatemala, Cross sectional |
All: Non-pregnant women aged 18 to 49 years without contraindication for pap smear examination. Group 1 – sex worker population: sex workers who had been visited as part of a local program to prevent STIs. Group 2 – general population: women who attended selected health centers regardless of the reason for the visit. |
|
Notes: DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; FTA-ABS, fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test; HPV, human papillomavirus; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; STIs, sexually transmitted infections; RPR, rapid plasma reagin; VDRL, Venereal Disease Research Laboratory.
Source: Prepared by the authors based on published data.