TABLE 2. Summary of risk of bias assessment (Newcastle–Ottawa Scale adapted for cross-sectional studies).
|
Author, year, and country |
|
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Clarke 2012 Costa Rica |
de Lima 2014 Brazil |
Figueiredo 2013 Brazil |
Figueiró-Filho 2007 Brazil |
Franceschi 2007 Colombia–Argentina |
Gabster 2016 Panama |
Hernandez-Girón 2005 Mexico |
Matos 2003 Argentina |
Miranda 2004 Brazil |
Paredes 2015 Colombia |
Pinto 2011 Brazil |
Santos 2016 Brazil |
Silveira 2017 Brazil |
Tamayo 2011 Colombia |
Vallés 2009 Guatemala |
Selection |
Representativeness of the sample |
|||||||||||||||
Sample size |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Non-responder rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Comparability |
Comparability between groups |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Outcome measurement |
Assessment of the outcome |
|||||||||||||||
Statistical test |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
Total score/8 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
Note:
The study fulfilled the assessed criteria;
The study measured the outcome through independent blind assessment or by record linkage.
Source: Prepared by the authors based on published data.