Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 21;46:e73. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.73

TABLE 2. Summary of risk of bias assessment (Newcastle–Ottawa Scale adapted for cross-sectional studies).

 

Author, year, and country

 

 

 

Clarke 2012 Costa Rica

de Lima 2014 Brazil

Figueiredo 2013 Brazil

Figueiró-Filho 2007 Brazil

Franceschi 2007 Colombia–Argentina

Gabster 2016 Panama

Hernandez-Girón 2005 Mexico

Matos 2003 Argentina

Miranda 2004 Brazil

Paredes 2015 Colombia

Pinto 2011 Brazil

Santos 2016 Brazil

Silveira 2017 Brazil

Tamayo 2011 Colombia

Vallés 2009 Guatemala

Selection

Representativeness of the sample

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

Sample size

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

 

 

*

*

 

*

*

*

Non-responder rate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

*

Comparability

Comparability between groups

 

*

*

 

*

 

 

*

*

*

*

 

 

*

 

Outcome measurement

Assessment of the outcome

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

**

Statistical test

 

*

*

 

*

*

 

 

*

*

*

 

*

 

*

Total score/8

3

6

5

4

5

5

3

4

6

6

6

3

5

5

6

Note:

*

The study fulfilled the assessed criteria;

**

The study measured the outcome through independent blind assessment or by record linkage.

Source: Prepared by the authors based on published data.