Skip to main content
. 2022 May 23;66(6):e00099-22. doi: 10.1128/aac.00099-22

TABLE 3.

Population pharmacokinetic models for different antifungal agentsa

Antifungal Yr Population Dialysis or RRT or ECMO No. patients (no. samples) Compartments (no.) Equation Reference
Caspofungin 2016 ICU patients Not mentioned 21 (419) 2 CL = 0.55 · (BW/70)0.75; V = 8.98 · (BW/70) 29
Micafungin 2017 ICU patients with sepsis and mechanical ventilation 19 patients were on intermittent hemodialysis and 11 patients were on ECMO 99 (436) 2 CL = 1.34 · (BW/84)0.59 · 1.14 (if albumin ≤ 25 g/L) · 0.75 (if SOFA ≥10); Vc = 11.8 · (BW/84)0.61 · 1.14 (if albumin ≤25 g/L); Vp = 7.68 · (BW/84)0.67 · 1.14 (if albumin ≤25 g/L) 19
Anidulafungin 2020 Critically ill patients Not mentioned 13 (205) 2 CL = 0.778 · (SOFA/12)-0.924; V =10.2 · (BMI/25)2.74 20
Fluconazole (i.v.) 2012 Critically ill patients Not mentioned 57 (295) 1 CL = 0.799 · (CLCR/92.7)0.685; V = 48.1 · (BW/65) 1.40 30
Fluconazole (p.o.) 2003 Patients in the surgical ICU Not mentioned 110 (409) 1 Cl = 1.19 · CLCR/(45.4 + CLCR); V = 109 · (BW/80)·{1 + [−0.0141 · (age − 60)]} 31
Voriconazole 2015 Critically ill patients with pulmonary disease Not mentioned 62 (240) 1 CL = 4.28·(DBIL/2.6) − 0.40; V = 93.4 32
a

BMI, body mass index; BW, body weight; CLCR, creatinine clearance; DBIL, direct bilirubin; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; ICU, intensive care unit; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment; RRT, renal replacement therapy; Vc, volumes of central distribution; Vp, volumes of peripheral distribution.