Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 24;139(8):1208–1221. doi: 10.1182/blood.2021011354

Table 3.

Comparison of manual and automated curation of variants using ACMG guidelines

TAPES (automated curation)
B/LB P/LP VUS No call
Manual curation B/LB 653 3 232 10
P/LP 0 30 19 0
VUS 40 10 529 4
NA* 71 0 498 2

TAPES (tool for assessment and prioritization in exome studies) was used for automated curation.

*

Predicted values where no review was carried out.

TAPES call where probability of pathogenicity disagreed with TAPES calls with Manual curation.