Table 1.
Drug | Study Name | Number of Participants | Main Message | Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|
Eculizumab | Triumph | 87 (43 eculizumab) | FACIT-F score significantly increased from baseline in eculizumab arm | [16, 51] |
Shepherd | 97 | Both FACIT-F score and EORTC-QLQ-C30 improved from baseline to week 52 | [14, 51] | |
Japanese experience | 54 | Both FACIT-F score and EORTC-QLQ-C30 meaningfully increased | [52] | |
Ravulizumab | 301 | 246 (125 ravulizumab, 121 eculizumab) | Improvement in FACIT-F score and EORTC-QLQ-C30 similar in the ravulizumab and eculizumab group | [33] |
302 | 195 (97 ravulizumab, 98 eculizumab) | Change in FACIT-F score from the baseline significantly higher in the ravulizumab group; change in EORTC-QLQ-C30 similar in both groups | [29] | |
302 extension | 191 (96 ravulizumab, 95 eculizumab to ravulizumab) | Mean FACIT-F score remained stable through study period; mean EORTC-QLQ-C30 was similar in both groups | [53] | |
302s | 95 | Ravulizumab preferred over eculizumab by a significant proportion of patients | [54] |
Abbreviations: EORTC, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-QLQ-C30 score; FACIT-F, the Functional assessment of chronic illness-Fatigue.