Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 21:1–25. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s11116-022-10299-4

Table 3.

Response rates in various tracking studies

Project name MOBIS SPOT IN-THE-MOMENT ATLAS AKTA Cincinnati Atlanta Reno Tel Aviv HTS
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
Tracker MotionTag MEILI rMove SITSS Device Device Device Device/App App
Country Switzerland Sweden USA NZ Denmark USA USA USA Israel
Year 2019 2015 2015 2014 2001–2003 2010 2011 2015–2016 2016–2017
Tracking days 56 7 7 3 112 3 7 7 2
Min. incentive (USD) $100 $25 Variable $25 $25 $25
Validation/annotation Optional Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Invited persons (N) 90,909 130,000 1427 186 25,000 11,118 16,374 25,817 67,199
Intro survey (N) 21,571
% of invited 23.73%
Qualified (N) 6,895 1159 478 38,500
% of invited 7.58% 0.89% 33.50% 57.29%
% of intro completed 31.96%
Registered (N) 5,375 495 295 77 500 4656 1938 602 27,415
% of invited 5.91% 0.38% 20.67% 41.40% 11.84% 40.80%
% of qualified 77.96% 42.71% 61.72% 71.21%
Started tracking (N) 4,218 293 295 73 500 4,656 602 25,201
% of invited 4.64% 0.23% 20.67% 39.25% 2.00% 41.88% 37.50%
% of qualified 61.17% 25.28% 61.72% 65.46%
Completed tracking (N) 3,690 51 240 65 500 3,849 1,061 312 23,240
% of invited 4.06% 0.04% 16.82% 34.95% 2.00% 34.62% 6.48% 1.21% 34.58%
% of qualified 53.52% 4.40% 50.21% 60.36%
% of registered 68.65% 10.30% 81.36% 84.42% 100.00% 82.67% 54.75% 51.83% 84.77%

Taken from (Molloy 2021)

1. Allström et al. (2017), 2. Greene et al. (2012), 3. Safi et al. (2015), 4. Nielsen (2004), 5. Wargelin et al. (2012), 6. Livingston (2011), 7. Stopher et al. (2018), 8. Nahmias-Biran et al. (2018)