Table 9.
Results of latent class analysis (4-cluster model).
| Technology lover (29%) | Social excluder (25%) | SST embracer (23%) | Insensitive pandemic-responder (23%) | Wald | p-value | R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIS | |||||||
| High | 0.23 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 0.34 | 19.15 | *** | 34% |
| Low | 0.77 | 0.28 | 0.05 | 0.66 | |||
| CUL | |||||||
| High | 0.35 | 0.58 | 0.81 | 0.30 | 22.89 | *** | 16% |
| Low | 0.66 | 0.42 | 0.19 | 0.70 | |||
| IDE | |||||||
| High | 0.99 | 0.15 | 0.92 | 0.09 | 28.36 | *** | 72% |
| Low | 0.01 | 0.85 | 0.08 | 0.91 | |||
| INO | |||||||
| High | 0.83 | 0.18 | 0.86 | 0.11 | 76.14 | *** | 49% |
| Low | 0.17 | 0.82 | 0.14 | 0.89 | |||
| User category | |||||||
| Adopter | 0.34 | 0.46 | 0.75 | 0.04 | 50.52 | *** | N/A |
| Not-interested | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.78 | |||
| Pure coper | 0.37 | 0.20 | 0.18 | 0.17 | |||
| Wait-and-see | 0.07 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0.00 | |||