Table 3.
Patient and provider opinions on possible reasons for incomplete sputum smear microscopy monitoring
Items | n |
---|---|
Patient perspective: reasons why patient sputum monitoring was not performed (n = 46, multiple responses allowed) | |
Did not have transport | 15 |
Not able to produce sputum | 10 |
Long waiting times for previous results | 8 |
Time it took to get to the health facility | 5 |
Power shortages | 3 |
Did not know | 3 |
Laboratory staff was away | 2 |
Provider perspective: reasons why providers did not perform sputum monitoring (n = 36, multiple responses allowed) | |
Patient failed to produce sputum | 28 |
Patient did not come back to the clinic | 26 |
Lack of materials (e.g., reagents, slides, microscope, cups) | 7 |
Power shortages | 4 |
Patient came when the laboratory was closed | 4 |
Laboratory staff was not available | 2 |
Provider perspective: reasons about why patients missed sputum monitoring (n = 25) | |
Long waiting times for sputum results | 9 |
Patients were given insufficient education about the importance of sputum monitoring at start of treatment | 6 |
Some health workers were not interested in TB patients | 3 |
Health workers in out-patient department did not submit requests for sputum | 2 |
Patients did not return and were represented by relatives instead | 2 |
Laboratory staff did not want to examine sputum | 2 |
Health workers did not know when sputum follow-up should be performed | 1 |
Challenges providers faced when recording sputum results in the unit tuberculosis register (n = 36) | |
Results were not available on the same day. | 20 |
Provider forgot to record results in the unit register | 10 |
Provider did not know how to fill in the register | 5 |
Provider did not know that it was necessary | 1 |