Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 21.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016 May;20(5):594–599. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.15.0591

Table 3.

Patient and provider opinions on possible reasons for incomplete sputum smear microscopy monitoring

Items n
Patient perspective: reasons why patient sputum monitoring was not performed (n = 46, multiple responses allowed)
 Did not have transport 15
 Not able to produce sputum 10
 Long waiting times for previous results 8
 Time it took to get to the health facility 5
 Power shortages 3
 Did not know 3
 Laboratory staff was away 2
Provider perspective: reasons why providers did not perform sputum monitoring (n = 36, multiple responses allowed)
 Patient failed to produce sputum 28
 Patient did not come back to the clinic 26
 Lack of materials (e.g., reagents, slides, microscope, cups) 7
 Power shortages 4
 Patient came when the laboratory was closed 4
 Laboratory staff was not available 2
Provider perspective: reasons about why patients missed sputum monitoring (n = 25)
 Long waiting times for sputum results 9
 Patients were given insufficient education about the importance of sputum monitoring at start of treatment 6
 Some health workers were not interested in TB patients 3
 Health workers in out-patient department did not submit requests for sputum 2
 Patients did not return and were represented by relatives instead 2
 Laboratory staff did not want to examine sputum 2
 Health workers did not know when sputum follow-up should be performed 1
Challenges providers faced when recording sputum results in the unit tuberculosis register (n = 36)
 Results were not available on the same day. 20
 Provider forgot to record results in the unit register 10
 Provider did not know how to fill in the register 5
 Provider did not know that it was necessary 1