Table 4.
Model fitting results |
Standardized parameter estimates |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRH pre-pandemic |
SRH pandemic |
|||||||||||
Model | vs. | -2LL | df | χ2 | Δ df | p | A | D | E | A | D | E |
1. Saturated | – | 4057.41 | 5617 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
2. ADE | 1 | 4069.94 | 5628 | 12.53 | 11 | 0.33 | .01 | .53 | .46 | .16 | .27 | .57 |
3. AE | 2 | 4072.41 | 5631 | 2.47 | 3 | 0.48 | .52 | – | .48 | .42 | – | .58 |
4. AE, rA = 1 | 3 | 4073.68 | 5632 | 1.27 | 1 | 0.26 | .51 | – | .49 | .38 | – | .62 |
5. AE, rA = 1, A11 = A21 | 4 | 4075.73 | 5633 | 2.05 | 1 | 0.15 | .45 | - | .55 | .45 | - | .55 |
Note. Best fitting model is presented in bold. Vs. = versus, -2LL = −2 Log Likelihood, df = degrees of freedom, χ2 = chi-square statistic, Δ df = difference in degrees of freedom, p = p-value, SRH = self-rated health, A = proportion of variance due to additive genetic factors, D = proportion of variance due to dominant genetic effects E = proportion of variance due to unique environmental effects.