Skip to main content
. 2021 May 29;17(3):453–483. doi: 10.1007/s11558-021-09423-3

Table 3.

Estimation of the impact of North–South LCs with enforcement and cooperation on South-North manufacture trade flows, 1995–2014

(1) (2)
VARIABLES ln mijt ln mijt
LC 0.308**
(0.146)
LCweak wo strong enforcement or deep cooperation - 0.244**
(0.076)
LCcoop with deep cooperation "only" - 1.315***
(0.149)
LCenf with strong enforcement "only" - -0.313
(0.209)
LCenfcoop with strong enforcement and deep cooperation - -0.190
(0.137)
ln (Distanceij) -1.340*** -1.334***
(0.080) (0.031)
Contiguityij 0.686* 0.664***
(0.356) (0.104)
Common Languageij 0.690*** 0.653***
(0.111) (0.039)
Past Colonialij 1.130*** 1.147***
(0.178) (0.051)
Common Colonialij 0.553*** 0.489***
(0.180) (0.066)
Depth of PTAijt 1.199*** 0.887***
(0.201) (0.097)
Sample South to North
Observations 23,372 23,372
Adj. R-squared 0.849 0.850
importer—year Fixed Effects (it) Yes Yes
exporter—year Fixed Effects (jt) Yes Yes

OLS estimates. Standard errors in parentheses are clustered at the dyad level; *p < 0.1; **p < 0.05; ***p < 0.01. The reference group is “PTAs with no LCs”. We construct the four variables capturing the four types of LCs as being mutually exclusive, i.e., Inline graphic

Source: authors' computation