TABLE 2.
Studies examining immunological responses to first and second doses of a COVID-19 vaccine
Author | Population | Vaccine | Dose | Measured response | Time postvaccine | Proportion with response | Associations with reduced response |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Boyarsky et al128 | 436 SOT recipients | BNT162b2 mRNA-1273 |
First | Anti-spike IgG | 20 d | 17% | Antimetabolite Increased age BNT162b2 vaccine |
Benotmane et al129 | 242 kidney transplant recipients | mRNA-1273 | First | Anti-spike IgG | 28 d | 10.8% | Shorter time from transplant Use of MMF Use of steroids Higher creatinine |
Yi et al130 | 145 kidney transplant recipients | BNT162b2 MmRNA-1273 |
First | Anti-spike IgG | At second dose | 5.5% | Not examined |
Boyarsky et al131 | 658 SOT recipients | mRNA-1273 BNT162b2 |
First Second |
Anti-spike IgG | 21–29 d | Dose 1: 15% Dose 2: 54% |
Not examined |
Marion et al132 | 895 first dose, 367 second dose SOT recipients | BNT162b2 MmRNA-1273 |
First Second |
Anti-spike IgG | 28 d | Dose 1: 6.4% Dose 2: 33.8% |
Not examined |
Bertrand et al133 | 45 kidney transplant recipients | BNT162b2 | First Second |
Anti-spike IgGIFN-γ producing T cells | 21–28 d | Dose 1: 2.2% humoral 24.4% cellular Dose 2: 17.8% humoral 57.8% cellular |
Humoral response: Recent transplantation Immunosuppression regime Cellular response: No significant association |
Schmidt et al134 | 40 SOT recipients | BNT162b2M mRNA-1273ChAdOx1 |
First Second |
Anti-spike IgG Neutralizing capacity IFN-γ producing T cells |
Dose 1: 5.3% humoral 23.7% cellular 26.3% humoral or cellular Dose 2: 35.3% humoral 64.7% cellular 70.6% humoral or cellular |
Homologous vaccine regime | |
Prendecki et al135 | 920 kidney transplant recipients | BNT162b2 ChAdOx1 |
Second | Anti-spike IgG T-cell response to spike protein |
31 d | 55% humoral 11% cellular 58% humoral or cellular |
Humoral response: ChAdOx1 vaccine Transplantation within 1 y Diabetes |
Stumpf et al136 | 368 kidney transplant recipients | BNT162b2 mRNA-1273 |
Second | Anti-spike IgG/IgA Neutralizing capacity IFN-γ producing T cells |
28–35 d | 42% humoral response 66% with neutralizing capacit 30% cellular response |
Use of MMF Use of CNI Use of belatacept BNT162b2 vaccine Older age Shorter duration of transplant |
Rozen-Zvi et al137 | 308 kidney transplant recipients | BNT162b2 | Second | Anti-spike IgG | 28 d | 36.4% | Higher MMF dose Higher CNI levels Lower eGFR Older age |
Kantauskaite et al138 | 225 kidney transplant recipients | BNT162b2mRNA-1273 | Second | Anti-spike IgG Neutralizing capacity |
14 d | 24.9%68% with neutralizing capacity | Higher trough MMF concentration Lower eGFR |
Benotmane et al139 | 205 kidney transplant recipients | mRNA-1273 | Second | Anti-spike IgG | 28 d | 47.8% | Previous kidney transplant Shorter transplant duration Lower eGFR More immunosuppression |
Cucchiari et al140 | 148 kidney and kidney pancreas recipients | mRNA-1273 | Second | Anti-spike IgG/MIFN-γ producing T cells | 14 d | 29.9% humoral 54.7% cellular 65% humoral or cellular |
Humoral response: Immunosuppression regime Cellular response: Diabetes Lymphopenia Decreasing eGFR ATG within 1 y |
Grupper et al141 | 136 kidney transplant recipients | BNT162b2 | Second | Anti-spike IgG | 16.5 d | 37.5% | Older age High dose steroid in past y Triple immunosuppressionUse of MMF |
Herrera et al142 | 104 liver and heart transplant recipients | mRNA-1273 | Second | Anti-spike IgGIFN-γ producing T cells | 28 d | 64% humoral 79% cellular 90% humoral or cellular |
Humoral response: Hypogammaglobulinemia Transplant within 1 y Higher dose of MMF Cellular response: Hypogammaglobulinemia |
Rabinowich et al143 | 80 liver transplant recipients | BNT162b2 | Second | Anti-spike IgG | 14.8 d | 47.5% | Older age High dose steroid in past y Use of MMF Triple immunosuppression Lower eGFR |
Peled et al144 | 77 heart transplant recipients | BNT162b2 | Second | Anti-RBD IgG Neutralizing antibody |
21 d | 18% 57% with neutralizing capacity |
Use of MMF |
Marinaki et al145 | 34 SOT recipients | BNT162b2 | Second | Anti-spike IgG | 10 d | 58.8% | Use of MMF |
This represents merely a selection of studies and is not an exhaustive list.
ATG, anti-thymocyte globulin; CNI, calcineurin inhibitor; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IFN-γ, interferon gamma; Ig, immunoglobulin; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; RBD, receptor-binding domain; SOT, solid organ transplant.