Skip to main content
. 2022 May 21;11:100126. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2022.100126

Table 1.

Negative online review clinical and surgical characterization.

Focus of the Review Number (percent) of complaints Surgical Patients (n = 70) Non-Surgical Patients (n = 227) p-value
Total complaints, N (%) Total complaints, N (%)
Clinical Complaints (N = 142)
Complication 48 (16%) 45 (64%) 3 (1%) <0.001
Readmission 4 (1%) 3 (4%) 1 (0%) <0.001
Reoperation 9 (3%) 9 (13%) 0 (0%) N/A
Uncontrolled pain 37 (12%) 27 (39%) 10 (4%) <0.001
Misdiagnosis 18 (6%) 6 (9%) 12 (5%) 0.232
Unclear treatment plan 8 (3%) 1 (1%) 7 (3%) 0.430
Delay in care 13 (4%) 7 (10%) 6 (3%) <0.001
Clinical Other 5 (2%) 1 (1%) 4 (2%) 0.833
Non-Clinical Complaints (N = 491) 99 43
Bedside Manner Doctor/Unprofessional 146 (49%) 32 (46%) 114 (50%) 0.595
Bedside Manner Midlevel/Unprofessional 21 (7%) 5 (7%) 16 (7%) 0.976
Rude/unprofessional Staff 92 (31%) 12 (17%) 80 (35%) 0.011
Wait Time 75 (25%) 9 (13%) 66 (29%) 0.012
Not enough time spent with provider 49 (16%) 4 (6%) 45 (20%) 0.008
Cost/billing/insurance 66 (22%) 18 (26%) 48 (21%) 0.406
Facilities 10 (3%) 1 (1%) 9 (4%) 0.287
Scheduling issues 30 (10%) 1 (1%) 29 (13%) 0.008
Non-clinical Other 2 (1%) 0 (0%) 2 (1%) 0.432
82 409

Table 1. Clinical and non-clinical review comments categorized by surgical and non-surgical patients. Bold denotes statistical significance (p<0.05) rate of complaint between surgical and non-surgical patients.