Table 1.
Comparing the catalytic activities of MoS2-based nanocomposites for degradation of various organic pollutants.
| Catalyst | AOP method | Pollutant | Parameters | DE (%) | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MoS2/g-C3N4 | Photocatalysis | MO | [pollutant] = 20 mg/L, [catalyst] = 1 g/L, light source = 500 W Xe lamp, time = 300 min |
∼60 | [39] |
| TiO2/MoS2 | Photocatalysis | Phenol | [pollutant] = 10 mg/L, [catalyst] ∼ 0.16 g/L, light source = 300 W Xe lamp, time = 120 min |
∼65 | [40] |
| MoS2/ZnO | Photocatalysis | MB NRH |
[pollutant] = 1 mg/L, [catalyst] = 0.75 g/L, light source = 200 W UV–Vis, time = 80 min |
64.29 57.12 |
[41] |
| MoS2/ BiPO4 | Photocatalysis | BG | [pollutant] = 10 mg/L, [catalyst] = 0.15 g/L, light source = solar light, time = 70 min |
∼65 | [42] |
| MoS2/BiOBr | Photocatalysis | RB5 | [pollutant] = 10 mg/L, [catalyst] = 0.5 g/L, light source = 15 W energy-saving light bulb, time = 120 min |
∼60 | [43] |
| MoS2/CNTs | Sonocatalysis | HCQ | [pollutant] = 20 mg/L, [catalyst] = 0.1 g/L, ultrasonic power = 150 W, time = 120 min | 70 | Present study |
MO: Methyl orange; MB: Methylene blue; NRH: Novacron red Huntsman; BG: Brilliant green; RB5: Reactive Black 5.