Table 2.
TC | NR | p | 휅 TC | 휅 NR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overall image quality | 4 (range 2–5) | 5 (range 2–5) | < 0.001 | 0.79 | 0.78 |
Anatomical details | 4 (range 2–5) | 5 (range 2–5) | < 0.001 | 0.65 | 0.68 |
Border sharpness myocardium–blood LV | 4 (range 2–5) | 5 (range 2–5) | < 0.001 | 0.76 | 0.64 |
Border sharpness myocardium–blood RV | 5 (range 2–5) | 5 (range 2–5) | < 0.001 | 0.73 | 0.67 |
Border sharpness myocardium–fat | 5 (range 2–5) | 5 (range 3–5) | < 0.001 | 0.61 | 0.62 |
Border sharpness myocardium–LGE | 5 (range 3–5) | 5 (range 4–5) | 0.016 | 0.65 | 0.83 |
Quality chest wall | 4 (range 2–5) | 5 (range 2–5) | < 0.001 | 0.70 | 0.66 |
Contrast ratio blood-to-myocardium | 4.66 (range 1.68–7.44), IQR 2.11 | 4.88 (range 1.83–8.28), IQR 2.48 | 0.001 | ||
Contrast ratio LGE-to-myocardium | 5.96 (range 2.76–13.28), IQR 4.41 | 6.33 (range 3.22–18.23), IQR 4.94 | < 0.001 | ||
LGE mass at FWHM [g] | 8.19 (range 3.24–30.98), IQR 8.88 | 6.52 (range 2.15–25.99), IQR 7.77 | < 0.001 |
TC, translational motion corrected; NRC, combined translational and non-rigid motion corrected; FWHM, full width at half maximum. Overall image quality scores: 5 = excellent image quality, interpretable with no artifacts; 4 = good image quality, interpretable with minimal artifacts; 3 = average image quality, interpretation mildly degraded by image artifacts; 2 = below average image quality, interpretable but moderately degraded; 1 = poor image quality, uninterpretable images. Anatomical details, sharpness, chest wall scores: 5 = excellent, 4 = good, 3 = average, 2 = below average, 1 = poor. Most data are not normally distributed or ordinal level, so median, range, and interquartile range (IQR) are provided for better comparability