Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 20;32(7):4340–4351. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08560-6

Table 2.

Summary of subjective and objective image quality scores

TC NR p 휅 TC 휅 NR
Overall image quality 4 (range 2–5) 5 (range 2–5) < 0.001 0.79 0.78
Anatomical details 4 (range 2–5) 5 (range 2–5) < 0.001 0.65 0.68
Border sharpness myocardium–blood LV 4 (range 2–5) 5 (range 2–5) < 0.001 0.76 0.64
Border sharpness myocardium–blood RV 5 (range 2–5) 5 (range 2–5) < 0.001 0.73 0.67
Border sharpness myocardium–fat 5 (range 2–5) 5 (range 3–5) < 0.001 0.61 0.62
Border sharpness myocardium–LGE 5 (range 3–5) 5 (range 4–5) 0.016 0.65 0.83
Quality chest wall 4 (range 2–5) 5 (range 2–5) < 0.001 0.70 0.66
Contrast ratio blood-to-myocardium 4.66 (range 1.68–7.44), IQR 2.11 4.88 (range 1.83–8.28), IQR 2.48 0.001
Contrast ratio LGE-to-myocardium 5.96 (range 2.76–13.28), IQR 4.41 6.33 (range 3.22–18.23), IQR 4.94 < 0.001
LGE mass at FWHM [g] 8.19 (range 3.24–30.98), IQR 8.88 6.52 (range 2.15–25.99), IQR 7.77 < 0.001

TC, translational motion corrected; NRC, combined translational and non-rigid motion corrected; FWHM, full width at half maximum. Overall image quality scores: 5 = excellent image quality, interpretable with no artifacts; 4 = good image quality, interpretable with minimal artifacts; 3 = average image quality, interpretation mildly degraded by image artifacts; 2 = below average image quality, interpretable but moderately degraded; 1 = poor image quality, uninterpretable images. Anatomical details, sharpness, chest wall scores: 5 = excellent, 4 = good, 3 = average, 2 = below average, 1 = poor. Most data are not normally distributed or ordinal level, so median, range, and interquartile range (IQR) are provided for better comparability