Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 30;52(7):3246–3259. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05251-x

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics from the matching task, the Personal Distance Scale, and outcome measures

Descriptive statistics: Matching task
Condition ASC group NA group
Self-Matching items

97% (3%)

1071 (303)

97% (5%)

913 (213)

Self-Mismatching items

95% (6%)

1281 (327)

93% (8%)

1102 (250)

Friend-Matching items

94% (7%)

1247 (339)

94% (7%)

1042 (265)

Friend-Mismatching items

95% (7%)

1302 (336)

93% (8%)

1088 (228)

Stranger-Matching items

93% (8%)

1256 (335)

90% (9%)

1031 (243)

Stranger-Mismatching items

96% (7%)

1267 (306)

96% (6%)

1093 (253)

Total across trials

95% (5%)

1238 (308)

94% (5%)

1044 (227)

Descriptive statistics: Personal Distance Scale
Condition ASC group NA group
Average distance: Self and Stranger 87 (23) 87 (25)
Average distance: Friend and Stranger 81 (25) 92 (12)
Descriptive statistics: outcome measures
Measure ASC group NA group
Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ)

38.51 (7.73)

Range: 40

18.82 (9.08),

Range: 36

Loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale)

37.08 (11.84),

Range: 58

22.38 (12.91),

Range: 53

RMET score (average number of correct responses in the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test)

26.44 (5.04),

Range: 27

N/A

In the first part of the table (matching task), average accuracy is represented in percentages (where 100% represents perfect accuracy); average reaction times are italicized and measured in milliseconds. For the Personal Distance Scale, higher numbers reflect greater difference between two individuals (maximum possible response: 100). Throughout the table, numbers in brackets reflect standard deviation