Table 5.
Diagnostic validity—ADOS vs. consensus diagnosis
Sensitivity (%) | Specifity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Autism vs. ASD/no | |||||
M2 (n = 16) | Rater 1 | 100.0 | 93.3 | 50.0 | 100.0 |
Rater 2 | 100.0 | 93.3 | 50.0 | 100.0 | |
M3 (n = 32) | Rater 1 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Rater 2 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |
Total M1-M3 (n = 56) | Rater 1 | 100.0 | 96.0 | 75.0 | 100.0 |
Rater 2 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |
Autism/ASD vs. no | |||||
M2 (n = 16) | Rater 1 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Rater 2 | 100.0 | 92.9 | 66.7 | 100.0 | |
M3 (n = 32) | Rater 1 | 100.0 | 92.9 | 66.7 | 100.0 |
Rater 2 | 100.0 | 92.9 | 66.7 | 100.0 | |
Total M1-M3 (n = 56) | Rater 1 | 100.0 | 91.5 | 69.2 | 100.0 |
Rater 2 | 100.0 | 93.6 | 75.0 | 100.0 |
PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value