Table 5.
Diagnostic validity—ADOS vs. consensus diagnosis
| Sensitivity (%) | Specifity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autism vs. ASD/no | |||||
| M2 (n = 16) | Rater 1 | 100.0 | 93.3 | 50.0 | 100.0 |
| Rater 2 | 100.0 | 93.3 | 50.0 | 100.0 | |
| M3 (n = 32) | Rater 1 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Rater 2 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |
| Total M1-M3 (n = 56) | Rater 1 | 100.0 | 96.0 | 75.0 | 100.0 |
| Rater 2 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |
| Autism/ASD vs. no | |||||
| M2 (n = 16) | Rater 1 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Rater 2 | 100.0 | 92.9 | 66.7 | 100.0 | |
| M3 (n = 32) | Rater 1 | 100.0 | 92.9 | 66.7 | 100.0 |
| Rater 2 | 100.0 | 92.9 | 66.7 | 100.0 | |
| Total M1-M3 (n = 56) | Rater 1 | 100.0 | 91.5 | 69.2 | 100.0 |
| Rater 2 | 100.0 | 93.6 | 75.0 | 100.0 |
PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value