Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 21;84(8):76. doi: 10.1007/s11538-022-01037-z

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

Illustration of the proof of Lemma 8 for the case t(q)>t(u). a When q is a tree node, the tail of the reticulation arc (pr) is moved up. b When q is a reticulation at the top, an LCA y of u and q is a parent of q with t(y)=t(q), leading to a contradiction to the assumption t(q)>t(u)