Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 5;74(3):1079–1085. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01246-0

Table 1.

Subgroup analysis according to the average number of hysteroscopic procedures performed in one year by each provider

Hysteroscopic procedures performed in one year (n, %) Less than 100 (107, 26.7) Between 100 and 500 (151, 37.7) Between 500 and 1000 (90, 22.5) More than 1000 (52, 13) p value
Most frequent indication for hysteroscopy < 0.001
Retained IUD with visible strings inside the cavity/endocervical canal (%) 34 (31.8) 62 (41.1) 47 (77.8)* 33 (63.5)*
Retained IUD without visible strings (%) 63 (58.9)° 67 (44.4)° 24 (11.0) 12 (23.1)
Extraction of a fragment of IUD (%) 9 (8.4) 18 (11.9) 17 (5.6) 6 (11.5)
Other (%) 1 (1.0) 4 (2.6) 2 (5.6) 1 (1.9)
In a case of a retained IUD without visible strings, which type of IUD is the most frequently extracted? 0.496
Copper T (%) 85 (79.4) 109 (71.1) 63 (70.0) 37 (71.1)
Mirena (%) 13 (12.1) 23 (15.2) 14 (15.6) 8 (15.4)
Multiload (%) 6 (5.6) 13 (8.6) 7 (7.8) 3 (5.8)
Other (%) 3 (2.9) 6 (5.1) 6 (6.6) 4 (7.7)
In a case of fragmented IUD, which type is the one most frequently extracted? 0.174
Copper T (%) 67 (55.8) 88 (58.2) 64 (71.1) 33 (63.4)
Mirena (%) 8 (6.7) 15 (9.9) 3 (3.3) 3 (5.8)
Multiload (%) 2 (1.7) 31 (20.5) 15 (16.7) 10 (19.2)
Other (%) 9 (7.5) 1 (0.7) 2 (2.2) 6 (11.6)
Unable to answer (%) 34 (28.3) 15 (10.7) 6 (6.7) 0

*p < 0.001 vs “Less than 100” and “Between 100 and 500”

°p < 0.001 vs Between “500 and 1000” and “More than 1000”