Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 9;134(11-12):442–448. doi: 10.1007/s00508-022-02011-4

Table 4.

Osteodensitometric parameters in the patient cohort separated by fracture status

Osteodensitometry
Patients with history of fracture
(n = 32)
Patients without history of fracture
(n = 50)
p-value
TBS 1.081 ± 0.088 1.174 ± 0.119 p<0.001
L1-L4
BMD, g/cm2 0.877 ± 0.140 0.913 ± 0.176 p = 0.69
T‑score −2.0 ± 1.49 −1.86 ± 1.47 p = 0.8
Z‑score −1.36 ± 1.22 −1.16 ± 1.16 p = 0.47
Femur neck
BMD, g/cm2 0.791 ± 0.127 0.784 ± 0.156 p = 0.85
T‑score −1.96 ± 1.12 −2.06 ± 1.14 p = 0.67
Z‑score −1.13 ± 0.9 −1.32 ± 1.04 p = 0.3
Femur total
BMD, g/cm2 0.801 ± 0.115 0.809 ± 0.147 p = 0.85
T‑score −1.85 ± 1.15 −2.03 ± 1.16 p = 0.42
Z‑score −1.77 ± 2.47 −1.37 ± 1.12 p = 0.71
Radius ultradistal
BMD, g/cm2 0.376 ± 0.096 0.402 ± 0.091 p = 0.21
T‑score −3.03 ± 1.81 −2.31 ± 1.74 p = 0.08
Z‑score −2.14 ± 2.03 1.61 ± −1.98 p = 0.38
Radius proximal third
BMD, g/cm2 0.714 ± 0.141 0.781 ± 0.141 p=0.04
T‑score −2.42 ± 1.3 −1.78 ± 1.28 p=0.04
Z‑score −1.74 ± 1.11 −1.13 ± 1.31 p = 0.05
Radius total
BMD, g/cm2 0.537 ± 0.105 0.592 ± 0.117 p=0.04
T‑score −2.82 ± 1.5 −2.05 ± 1.54 p=0.04
Z‑score −2.06 ± 1.42 −1.42 ± 1.57 p = 0.08

bold values reached statistical significance