Table 5.
The performance of ARIA in testing dataset.
| Testing (using RF) | Ten-fold cross validation (using SVM) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Se (%) | Sp (%) | Acc (%) | Se (%) | Sp (%) | Acc (%) | |
| Good quality VS poor quality | 98.0 | 99.1 | 98.6 | 99.0 | 98.3 | 98.6 |
| Good quality VS EAAPQ | 98.6 | 99.8 | 99.5 | 99.0 | 99.7 | 99.5 |
| Good quality VS AAPQ | 98.7 | 99.8 | 99.5 | 99.8 | 99.6 | 99.6 |
| EEAPQ VS AAPO | 93.8 | 92.2 | 93.0 | 93.8 | 92.2 | 93.0 |
RF Random forest, SVM Support vector machine, EAAPQ Eye-abnormality-associated-poor-quality, AAPQ Artefact-associated-poor-quality, Se Sensitivity, Sp Specificity, Acc Accuracy.