Table 2.

Hierarchical Regression Analyses for Associations of Predisposing, Enabling and Need-related Factors with Total Number of Supportive Service Use

	Step 1				Step 2				Step 3
Variable	B	SE (B)	β	t	B	SE (B)	β	t	B	SE (B)	β	t
Predisposing
Age	−0.02***	.00	−.32	−5.26	−0.02***	.01	−.29	−4.23	−0.02***	.00	−.26	−3.97
Gender - Male	−0.10	.11	−.05	−0.91	−0.09	.11	−.05	−0.80	−0.06	.11	−.03	−0.53
Non-Hispanic White - Yes	0.12	.11	.06	1.03	0.10	.12	.05	0.83	0.05	.11	.03	0.41
Relationship Type - Parent	−0.00	.11	−.00	−0.03	−0.02	.11	−.01	−0.18	−0.10	.11	−.06	−0.97
Enabling
Residential Care - Yes					−0.10	.10	−.06	−0.92	−0.11	.12	−.07	−0.96
Income Adequacy					−0.04	.07	−.04	−0.58	0.05	.07	.05	0.73
Employment Status – FT					0.03	.11	.02	0.32	0.02	.10	.01	0.22
Instrumental Support					−0.04	.06	−.04	−0.59	−0.03	.06	−.03	−0.44
Emotional Support					0.14	.10	.10	1.47	0.15	.09	.11	1.60
Need-related
Caregiver Burden									0.02*	.01	.15	2.30
Depression									0.03*	.01	.18	2.69
Health Status									0.12	.07	.10	1.63
Distance from CR									0.00	.00	.06	1.13
Time Spent Helping CR									0.00**	.00	.18	3.12
CR Cognitive Status									−0.02	.03	−.06	−0.92
CR Functional Status									0.01*	.01	.15	2.15
R 2	.10				.11				.23
Adjusted R2	.09				.08				.18
F for change in R2	7.59***				0.68				5.89***

^*p < .05

^**p <.01

^***p < .001

FT = Full Time; CR = Care recipient