Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 3;44(3):1215–1228. doi: 10.1007/s11357-021-00482-3

Table 1.

Participant characteristics by athletic status

Control (CON) Masters Endurance athletes (EMA) Masters power athletes (PMA)
No 18 14 11
Age, y 70.7 ± 3.7 68.6 ± 3.6 70.5 ± 6.8
Physical properties
Lean mass, kg 54.95 ± 5.3 54.48 ± 5.9 58.48 ± 4.0
Fat mass, kg 16.87 ± 4.7b 7.92 ± 3.3 13.80 ± 5.3b
PQCSA, cm2 62.2 ± 7.4 64.8 ± 11.0 75.8 ± 12.4ab
Grip strength, N 43.2 ± 6.3 41.0 ± 4.9 44.3 ± 5.2
Jump power, W/kg 2.47 ± 0.37 2.29 ± 0.31 2.79 ± 0.56b
TUG, s 5.91 ± 0.43 5.41 ± 0.42a 5.36 ± 0.66a
MUP features
Complexity (no. of turns) 4.23 ± 0.81 4.51 ± 0.93 4.25 ± 1.1
Duration, ms 16.3 ± 1.87 16.15 ± 3.01 15.72 ± 2.07
Firing rate, Hz 9.11 ± 1.19b 8.30 ± 1.01 9.61 ± 1.69b

Data are mean ± standard deviation

PQCSA, peak quadriceps cross-sectional area; TUG, timed up and go; MUP, motor unit potential

The values in bold in the tables reflect statistically significant (p < .05) differences between groups. aSignificant difference to CON; bsignificant difference to EMA. All MUP features were recorded at 25% MVC