TABLE 1.
Properties of common IOL materials.
| Materials | Foldable/unfoldable | Biocompatibility | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMMA | Unfoldable (rigid) | Low rate of inflammatory cell accumulation | Low cost | 5–6 mm incision to insert |
| High rate of PCO* | Low aqueous flare | |||
| High visual quality | ||||
| PDMS | Foldable (soft) | Low rate of inflammatory cell accumulation | Small incision | Tissue injury during expanding in capsular |
| Fibrotic reaction of lens surface | Opacification of surface after contacting with intravitreal air | |||
| Hydrophilic acrylic | Foldable (soft) | Low rate of inflammatory cell accumulation | Low aqueous flare | Limitation in shape design |
| High rate of PCO calcification | Easy to handle | Long-term IOL opacification | ||
| Hydrophobic acrylic | Foldable (soft) | Low rate of PCO | Good visual quality | High aqueous flare |
| High rate of inflammatory cell accumulation | Compatible with a sharp-edged design | Tacky surface | ||
| High RI* |
*PCO, posterior capsular opacification; RI, refractive index.