Table 6.

Multiple mediation analysis.

Path	Indirect effects	Total effects	VAF	Bootstrap 95%	Confidence Interval	Mediation
				2.5%	97.5%
ATT → PSR → INT	0.202	0.222	0.912	0.074	0.323	Full Mediation
CPC - > TRU - > PSR - > INT	0.207	0.624	0.332	0.135	0.297	Partial Mediation
CPC - > ATT - > PSR	0.321	0.511	0.628	0.127	0.500	Partial Mediation
EXP - > PSR - > INT	0.153	0.590	0.260	-0.281	-0.050	Partial Mediation
CPC - > TRU - > INT	0.063	0.624	0.101	-0.157	0.254	No Mediation
CPC - > EXP - > PSR	0.250	0.511	0.490	-0.442	-0.086	Partial Mediation
CPC - > TRU - > PSR	0.441	0.511	0.862	0.276	0.595	Full Mediation
CPC - > ATT - > PSR- > INT	0.151	0.624	0.242	0.053	0.246	Partial Mediation
CPC - > ATT - > INT	0.015	0.624	0.023	-0.168	0.143	No Mediation
CPC - > EXP - > INT	0.335	0.624	0.537	0.181	0.469	Partial Mediation
TRU - > PSR - > INT	0.298	0.362	0.823	0.175	0.389	Full Mediation
CPC - > EXP - > PSR - > INT	0.158	0.624	0.253	-0.220	-0.041	Partial Mediation

Note: 1. VAF would be smaller than 0.2 in the presence of a significant indirect effect.

(VAF <0.2 = no mediation; 0.2 ≤ VAF ≤_0.8 = partial mediation; VAF >0.8 = full mediation) (Aparicio et al., 2021).

2. Mediation effects were present when the 95% bootstrap confidence interval did not straddle a 0 between the upper and lower intervals.

(Preacher and Hayes, 2008).