Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 8;13:859188. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.859188

TABLE 4.

Performance comparison on Check390.

Method Sn(%) Sp(%) ACC(%) Str (%) MCC
IGPCR-Drug Xiao et al. (2013) 80.8 66.9 71.6 73.9 0.45
OET-KNN Hu et al. (2016) 67.7 84.2 78.7 76.9 0.52
QuickRBF Hu et al. (2016) 76.2 77.7 77.2 77.6 0.52
SVM Hu et al. (2016) 76.2 78.9 78.0 77.6 0.53
RF Hu et al. (2016) 78.5 78.1 78.2 78.3 0.54
RF + PPP Hu et al. (2016) 83.1 79.6 80.8 81.3 0.60
DWKNN Wang et al. (2020) 83.9 80.0 81.3 81.9 0.61
DWKNN(Ensemble) Wang et al. (2020) 83.1 82.7 82.8 82.9 0.63
BOW-GBDT Qiu et al. (2021) 80.0 90.0 86.7 85.0 0.70
Our method 87.1 89.4 88.4 88.3 0.76

The best results for each metric are in bold.