Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 8;13:900210. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.900210

Table 3.

Physiological response of S. imbricata to varying drought and salinity stresses.

Drought stress (% field capacity) Photosynthetic rate (μmol m−2 S−1) Leaf water potential (MPa) Na+1 uptake (μ mole g−1) Cl −1 uptake (μ mole g−1)
100 (WL1) 23.23 −21.99 405.9 40.42
80 (WL2) 21.24 −23.90 419.7 44.00
60 (WL3) 19.95 −28.94 423.8 43.33
40 (WL4) 17.55 −29.38 420.3 41.83
LSD (0.05) NS 5.30 NS NS
Salinity stress (dS m−1)
5 (S1) 22.48 −20.30 398.8b 38.67
10 (S2) 19.90 −24.26 428.7a 42.33
15 (S3) 19.73 −35.01 404.3b 40.63
20 (S4) 20.17 −24.47 438.0a 47.96
LSD NS 5.30 14.50 5.84
Interaction (WS*SS) Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4

Means with different letters in each category are significantly different at α = 0.05. NS, WS, SS, and LSD stand for no significant, drought stress, salinity stress and least significant difference, respectively. The * symbol indicates the interaction.