Table 1.
Comparison of the attractiveness amongst the ratios using one way ANOVA and Post Hoc Tukey Test.
| Proportion | Least Attractive (n = 8) | Average Attractive (n = 9) | Very Attractive (n = 23) | ONE WAY ANOVA |
POSTHOC TUKEY TEST |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F value (* = welch test) | p value | Least Attractive vs Average Attractive difference (p value) | Least Attractive vs Very Attractive difference (p value) | Average Attractive vs Very Attractive difference (p value) | ||||
| Ch:Ln | 1.33 ± 0.24 | 1.69 ± 0.23 | 1.38 ± 0.15 | 10.097 | 0.001 | −0.35 (0.001) | −0.05 (0.812) | 0.31 (0.001) |
| Lc:Ch | 1.74 ± 0.43 | 1.43 ± 0.28 | 1.59 ± 0.28 | 3.625* | 0.054 | 0.31 (0.114) | 0.02 (0.989) | −0.29 (0.056) |
| Ts:Lc | 1.44 ± 0.27 | 1.54 ± 0.33 | 1.65 ± 0.25 | 0.319 | 0.729 | −0.11 (0.711) | −0.06 (0.833) | 0.04 (0.926) |
| LC-Me:Tr-LC | 1.36 ± 0.35 | 1.33 ± 0.42 | 1.66 ± 0.35 | 3.611 | 0.037 | 0.03 (0.984) | −0.3 (0.13) | −0.33 (0.071) |
| LN-Me:LC-LN | 2.16 ± 0.2 | 2.18 ± 0.21 | 1.62 ± 0.17 | 7.87 | 0.001 | −0.01 (0.99) | 0.23 (0.013) | 0.24 (0.006) |
| LC-LN:LN-St | 1.2 ± 0.16 | 1.28 ± 0.2 | 1.58 ± 0.25 | 3.56 | 0.039 | −0.08 (0.732) | −0.23 (0.047) | −0.15 (0.241) |