Table 1.
Discrimination Reporting Pattern in 1992, 2000, and 2010 | Racial Discrimination | SES Discrimination | Gender Discrimination | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | |
Never, never, never | 1,054 | 38.0 | 1,325 | 47.8 | 759 | 27.4 |
Never, never, ever | 87 | 3.1 | 135 | 4.9 | 71 | 2.6 |
Never, ever, ever | 91 | 3.3 | 113 | 4.1 | 114 | 4.1 |
Never, ever, neverb | 149 | 5.4 | 216 | 7.8 | 210 | 7.6 |
Ever, never, neverb | 312 | 11.3 | 335 | 12.1 | 389 | 14.0 |
Ever, never, everb | 75 | 2.7 | 91 | 3.3 | 106 | 3.8 |
Ever, ever, neverb | 285 | 10.3 | 223 | 8.0 | 440 | 15.9 |
Ever, ever, ever | 721 | 26.0 | 336 | 12.1 | 685 | 24.7 |
Total inconsistent reportingc | 821 | 29.7 | 865 | 31.2 | 1,145 | 41.3 |
Abbreviations: CARDIA, Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults; SES, socioeconomic status.
a Percentages sum to 100.1 because of rounding.
b These 4 categories denote inconsistent reporting patterns across the 3 study visits and are represented in the “total inconsistent reporting” category.
c Results for the 4 categories with inconsistent reporting patterns across the 3 study visits.