Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 8;12:807264. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.807264

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A, B) AUC-ROC of the four comparative methods in the (A) primary and (B) external validation cohorts (top row). (C, D) AUC-PR of the four comparative methods in the (C) primary and (D) external validation cohorts (middle row). (E, F) DeLong test for the four comparative methods in the (E) primary and (F) external validation cohorts (bottom row). In this work, we used a probability threshold of 0.7 (that is, any patient with a pCR prediction probability greater than 0.7 was reported as a pCR candidate). No significant difference (ns): P > 0.05, *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001.